There are now reports that the UHaul was rented by Holly Zoller, who is associated with the “Louisville Bail Project.”

A phone call was placed to Zoller and she confirmed that she had, in fact, rented the U-Haul truck in question.

A U-Haul employee provided the receipt which is reflected above, confirming that Zoller was the renter.

Here is Holly Zoller’s page on The Bail Project (TBP) website where she is described as a “Bail Disruptor.” The “Bail Project” is a nationwide group, with listings of dozens of “Bail Disruptors” and other positions among the “Team,” and the Lousiville Bail Project is an affiliate of the national organization.

Another member of the TBP is Delores Canales, previously a Soros Justice Fellow, and the co-founder of California Families Against Solitary Confinement.

David Reaboi
@davereaboi
Oh, that’s perfectly reasonable:

“Hunter Biden received a $3.5 million wire transfer from Elena Baturina, the wife of the former mayor of Moscow.”
BREAKING: Hunter Biden Received Millions From Wife Of Ex-Moscow Mayor, Paid Suspects Allegedly Tied...
dailywire.com

Sean Davis
@seanmdav
Media had a meltdown when Donald Trump, Jr. met with a Fusion GPS client for a hot second, but they're now going to pretend it's no big deal that Biden's dirtbag son used daddy's name to grease deals with foreign crooks who just wanted to buy off the VP.
Senate Report: Hunter Biden's Chinese Activity Raise Criminal Concerns
thefederalist.com

If this were one of Trump’s kids, there’d be wall to wall coverage right and Pelosi would already be drawing up the articles of impeachment. Further, there would be widespread demands for the DOJ to investigate for criminal behavior.

I suspect that’s where this is headed, and it’s another reason Joe Biden may be more desperate to win that some think. The only way he can protect his corrupt family is to gain power over the DOJ. There’s simply noway everything that went on here was above board. The wives of Putin stooges do not wire millions of dollars to the VP’s son for no reason

BREAKING: Hunter Biden Received Millions From Wife Of Ex-Moscow Mayor, Paid Suspects Allegedly Tied To Trafficking, Had Contacts With Chinese Military, Senate Report Alleges https://t.co/EjnmpTtgBg

— Ryan Saavedra (@RealSaavedra) September 23, 2020

Chuck Ross
@ChuckRossDC
·
Sep 23, 2020
NEW: Hunter Biden’s Business Dealings Created ‘Counterintelligence And Extortion Concerns,’ Senate Report Says

U.S. banks flagged multiple suspicious transactions involving Hunter, including with a Chinese businessman and a Russian billionaire

Evidence //

The Fox News host was talking about the left threatening violence after the passing of Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Friday.

During the segment, Carlson dropped receipt after receipt in talking about their threats, noting that some had marched to Sen. Majority Leader Mitch McConnell’s home, while others threatened to “burn it all down” if Trump made the decision to submit a SCOTUS nomination for Senate consideration.

The conditionless optimism that the Republicans emanate is absent in the Democrats. They want you to know things are really bad and they’re only going to get worse if Trump is reelected. They seldom talk about the tenacity and relentlessness of the American people or the way they conquer one problem after another that creates a society of limitless possibilities.

Democrats seem to believe our society is in a state of arrested development and that it will continue to stay that way, or at least they want you to believe that.

There’s something dark and depressing about it. Even their attempts at humor seem sad.

The Daily Wire’s video perfectly highlights these differences.

Something is missing. Like a couple that stays together but no longer really likes each other, the Democrats don’t seem to like America but they do want to stay because they don’t have any other option.

Republicans, meanwhile, truly love this country and want the best for it. They think it truly is something great and could even be greater. They believe in it and want to support it under the knowledge that it’s not done achieving heights yet.

This attitude is important to understand. One party will take us nowhere, the other to the stars both figuratively and probably very literally.

During the course of the last four years, we have heard every excuse in the book as to why Republicans can’t do something that they are entitled to do. Most of the time, it is some appeal to fairness, or justice, or some other appeal to emotion, but never do Democrats argue that the Constitutionally-appointed rules are being broken. The issue isn’t that Democrats are actually being treated unfairly. The rules have been clear. The communicating of ideals has been equal. They have run for the same offices, in the same states, in the same country as Republicans. It is that they have lost. Now that their failures have mounted to the point of cementing their legacy of failure for the next couple of decades, they want to change the rules. //

The rules of the game are written in advance so that all parties participating in the game, know how to succeed from the onset.

The rules for our country have long been written. //

The rules for the “game” are clear. Democrats don’t hate Republicans for their ability to conduct the business of government as they see fit. They hate the Constitution and many of the rules they’ve instituted because now, they’ve lost.

It isn’t like they haven’t tried to play the game. It’s just that… well… they suck at it. //

Here we are, beating the Democrats at their own game again and again, so what do they propose? Changing the rules again. Dems, instead of trying to appeal to voters in areas they know they are losing, are proposing to make D.C. and Puerto Rico states, //

Democrats aren’t mad that Republicans get to nominate and confirm a Justice of their choice. They are mad that they don’t. End of Story.

Which brings me to this thought exercise: Take a minute and try to think of a time, in the last 50 years, that Republicans have either changed procedural rules (or threatened to do so) in response to Democrats’ exercise of a legal, Constitutionally-appointed power? Sure, they’ve threatened to use the newly appointed power or rule change once they are in power, but when have they ever explicitly changed or threatened to change rules? Can’t think of a time? Neither can I. Now, do the same with Democrats.

The old sayings “the rules are rules” and “elections have consequences” have never been more true. The only difference is that Democrats don’t want to live by either. Sorry guys, those are the rules.

Trump War Room - Text TRUMP to 88022
@TrumpWarRoom
Joe Biden made $15.6 MILLION in the two years after he left office.

But watch him casually lie to Detroit workers yesterday, claiming $400,000 "is more money than I’ve ever made."

Ben Shapiro
@benshapiro
Democrats' radically nuclear response to the SCOTUS vacancy is a real threat to Joe Biden's candidacy. Up until now, Biden has been able to run as the "take a breath" candidate. Things have been crazy; here's an empathetic elderly gentleman who will restore normalcy.
11:03 AM · Sep 21, 2020

All of that goes by the wayside when Dems threaten to kill the filibuster, ram through new states, pack the court, and impeach people just to delay Supreme Court hearings. Now the election becomes a referendum on the new, far more threatening batch of crazy Dems are proposing.

And it IS crazy. If Democrats were to kill the filibuster, add states, and pack the court, the fundamental nature of the federal government would be completely rewritten. Essentially, a bare majority of Democrats would be able to, unchecked, rewrite the Constitution.

States would correctly resist. Imagine a 53-vote Democratic majority (adding four Dem Senators from DC and Puerto Rico, e.g.) ramming through a gun confiscation package. Imagine a 13-member packed SCOTUS greenlighting that measure. You think TX, MS, GA, FL stand for that?

Checks and balances were designed to require overwhelming consent to major political changes. Democrats have long objected to those checks and balances, but have refrained from utterly abolishing them. That's because the consequences of abolishing them is national dissolution.

This isn’t just empty rhetoric, they mean it. And packing the court with at least two additional seats—one for Ginsburg and one for Merrick Garland, whom Democrats feel is entitled to a seat simply because President Obama nominated him—is just the beginning of what Democrats will try to do if Biden wins the election. Schemes are now afoot to pack the court, abolish the Senate filibuster, and grant statehood to Washington D.C. and Puerto Rico.

What all these moves have in common is that they would erode the constitutional mechanisms in place that Democrats see as impediments to their complete control over the levers of government power.

Expanding the number of states, for example, is a work-around for what they would like to do but can’t quite bring themselves to say outright: abolish states’ equal representation in the Senate. Why, they ask, should sparsely populated conservative states like South Dakota get as many votes in the Senate as California and New York? By adding what Democrats believe would be permanently blue states, they could cement their control over the Senate and stop worrying about what Americans in South Dakota or Wyoming think.

The same logic applies to getting rid of the Senate filibuster. Once Democrats are in control of the Senate, why should a minority of GOP senators be allowed to stop them from carrying out their designs? The common thread here, from court-packing to new states to ending the filibuster, is that Democrats believe they have an obligation, once they gain power, to ensure they never lose it again. If that means shredding the parts of the Constitution that have held them back in the past, then so be it.

That, in turn, means there’s more at stake in November than the electoral fortunes of one Donald J. Trump. The Constitution itself is on the ballot.

Karma: Harry Reid

Biden allowed himself to be compromised while Communist China was aggressively building up its military strength by stealing US Military secrets from the US, including stealing business propriety secrets from US companies, and not skipping a beat in becoming the most serious military threat to the very survival of the United States and its ally, Taiwan.

Hunter’s small company, Rosemont, was given $1.5 Billion to create a Chinese Equity Fund entitled Bohai Harvest RST (Shanghai) Equity. Hunter then got involved in many investment deals, outlined in the below listed video, including investing in companies under investigation by the FBI because they were stealing US Nuclear Secrets from the United States, and with companies intending to take control of rare earth minerals to the detriment of the US, in order to serve the interest of the Chinese Communist Military. //

Biden’s son Hunter has never been trained to manage investments, nor has he ever had the experience of dealing with the complexities of doing business in Communist China. Yet, he flew into China on Air Force Two and was given a deal by Communist China that no one else in the world has ever received in history, not Goldman Sachs, J P Morgan Chase, Morgan Stanley, Barclays, B of A Securities, Citigroup, Credit Suisse, etc. Those firms do not believe that an inexperienced Hunter or his small company can manage such a massive investment portfolio . //

The infiltration of the US Military Industrial Complex by Communist Chinese companies operating in the US is being supported and facilitated by Douglas Emhoff, Kamala Harris’s husband. Douglas Emhoff is employed by DLA Piper; the firm is the consultant on behalf of a bevy of Chinese Communist Party-owned companies and the firm employs former Chinese Communist Party Officials. Douglas Emhoff has served as a partner in the firm’s Intellectual Property and Technology Practice Sector and its Media, Sport, and Entertainment Sector since 2017.

Joe Biden never let the truth slow him down - Dementia Joe doesn't know what the truth is anymore. //

But that was ALWAYS Joe Biden’s biggest problem — he was willing to say pretty much anything about himself if he thought it enhanced his standing in the media or the Democrat Party. Here are some of the lines that drove him from the race in September 1987 when the NYT and Des Moines Register reported the plagiarism: //

In May 1987, in a speech before the Welsh Labour Party, Neil Kinnock had delivered the following lines: //

some reporters recognized that Biden had used these lines before, and when he did he had attributed them to Kinnock — he didn’t claim them for his own. But it was also beyond dispute that in the instances cited by the NYT and Des Moines Register, Biden had personalized that part of the stump speech without referencing Kinnock — and several other aspects of Kinnock’s earlier speech — and claimed them for his own. //

What came to be more widely understood in the aftermath of Biden’s departure from the race because of the controversy over Kinnock’s biography was that Biden was a serial offender, taking parts of speeches without attribution from other prominent Democrats over the years. Again, without the benefit of the internet, this took a decent amount of legwork by political reporters.

In a speech to the California Democratic Party Biden used without attribution passages from a speech given by Robert F. Kennedy had John F. Kennedy. In 1985 and 1986 Biden’s speeches used without attribution a passage from a 1976 speech by Hubert H. Humphrey. //

As a part of the Kinnock controversy, it was revealed that Biden had been involved in a similar incident during his first year at Syracuse University School of Law in 1965. Biden initially received an “F” in an introductory class on the legal methodology for writing a paper relying almost exclusively on a single Fordham Law Review article, which he had cited only once. //

Dementia Joe knows he’s running for President. Dementia Joe knows that he’s been a prominent politician in the United States for nearly 50 years. Dementia Joe knows that he SHOULD know things of substance and significance. Dementia Joe knows the stories that are in his head, and that he should be able to tell just as he’s told them for decades. So he does.

But Dementia Joe no longer knows if those stories are all true, partly true, or not true at all.

Joe Biden knew, but didn’t concern himself with such unimportant details. But Joe Biden isn’t running for President.

Dementia Joe is on the ballot for the Democrat Party.

The line also happens to be a lie. //

Charlotte Alter
·
Sep 17, 2020
Biden: "Guys like me, the first in my family to go to college... we are as good as anybody else, and guys like Trump, who inherited everything and squandered what they inherited, are the people I've always had a problem with"
Mollie
@MZHemingway
FWIW, the New York Times reported in 1987 that Biden admitted his claim of being the first in his family to go to college was not true. It was rather famously plagiarized from a speech by British Labor leader Neil Kinnock. https://nytimes.com/1987/09/18/us/biden-admits-plagiarism-in-school-but-says-it-was-not-malevolent.html

Sean Davis
@seanmdav
Not only is Biden’s claim not true, it was plagiarized by Biden during his first presidential campaign run back in 1987.

Again, the big problem with so many in political media isn’t that they’re biased; it’s that they’re ignorant and often quite dumb.

"If you're able to, chip in now!"

If it's happening in Nashville, where else is it happening?

Black Lives Matter has been responsible for the lion’s share of destruction, violence, and mayhem this year and an independent research group now has the numbers to prove it.

The Armed Conflict Location and Event Data Project (ACLED), a nonprofit organization with a focus on global conflict, collected data over the summer supported by Princeton University. As the Federalist’s Joy Pullman reported, ACLED found that of the hundreds of riots that occurred this year, 95 percent were found to have perpetrators that that had an affiliation with Black Lives Matter:

Of the 633 incidents coded as riots, 88 percent are recorded as involving Black Lives Matter activists. Data for 51 incidents lack information about the perpetrators’ identities. BLM activists were involved in 95 percent of the riots for which there is information about the perpetrators’ affiliation.

Early estimates from insurance agencies say the cost of this summer’s rioting will set a record surpassing that of the 1992 Rodney King riots, which cost an inflation-adjusted $1.2 billion.

To win, all Biden has to do is stand up and say this... "I promise to leave you alone to live your life in peace." That's all.

Introducing Commander Asthma.

Wow, they're actually saying it... //

Stephen L. Miller
·
Sep 15, 2020
Joe Biden just called it "a Harris Biden administration"
Stephen L. Miller
@redsteeze
A day after this

Townhall.com
@townhallcom
“A Harris Administration... together with Joe Biden”

They’re saying the quiet part out loud again...

Nick Short 🇺🇸
@PoliticalShort
So is it the Biden-Harris administration or the Obama-Biden administration or the Harris-Biden administration?

Trump War Room - Text TRUMP to 88022
Umm... Joe Biden just touted the actions of "the Obama-Biden Administration" and said "this is just the beginning if we get re-elected."