Daily Shaarli
August 6, 2021
Replacing babies with pets stifles a person’s capacity to give and receive love, as it wrongly directs our greatest earthly affections toward ourselves. //
In a recent Fox News piece, sociologist Andrea Laurent-Simpson writes of the emergence of “multispecies families,” explaining that in “child-free families…dogs and cats paw in to fill a longing to nurture” and would-be grandparents “readily shift over to spoiling the granddog as their daughters and sons choose instead to pursue lucrative careers.” But this is neither good nor new.
The ancient historian Plutarch began his life of Pericles with an anecdote about Caesar, who, upon seeing “wealthy foreigners in Rome carrying puppies and young monkeys about in their bosoms and fondling them” asked, “if the women in their country did not bear children.” Plutarch thought this a “princely” rebuke of “those who squander on animals that proneness to love and loving affection which is ours by nature, and which is due only to our fellow-men.”
Another ancient text tells us that there is nothing new under the sun. There is certainly nothing new about treating pets as substitutes for children, though it does seem to be more common of late, a trend that debases us and deforms our pets — literally in some cases. The overbreeding of dogs has, for instance, produced breeds that struggle to breathe or routinely need C-sections to give birth. If these people love dogs, then it is with a selfish and consumerist sort of love.
Of course, we ought to love our pets. But this love must be directed to them as the animals they are, rather than as mere objects for our amusement, or as substitutes for children. I love my dogs and try to take good care of them. They were bred to be loveable, and they are entertaining and affectionate. And they have a place in family life. With the right training and supervision, dogs and kids are great for each other. My daughter really, really loves our dogs. Notably, neither she nor the dogs are confused about who is the human. That sort of disordered affection requires an adult.
Pets may be valuable companions to the lonely and childless, but it is perverse to make this palliative measure into a preference, deliberately rejecting children in favor of a pampered pet. //
But what we need are other persons. We are, in important ways, incomplete and not fully human on our own. As Aristotle long ago noted, man is a social animal, and a man who can live without others must be either a beast or a god — people who don’t need people aren’t really people.
The Christian may add that in exceptional circumstances or vocations a few people may need to rely entirely on animal companionship and the person of God, but there is no good reason to deliberately turn to beasts in place of persons.
Praxis
Another solution in search of a problem.
The fact is that per gallon tax takes all the factors into account all by itself. Weight, mileage, distance driven, all inherent to this very simple and defensible system. No need for armies of planners and seat moisteners 'estimating' costs and impacts.
What they want is twofold...yet more costs ladled onto drivers in an attempt to force them off the road with economic pain, and the ability to micromanage your driving down to the tiniest detail. And they want a wedge to start having scaled rates for distance as economic punishment, and to ration mobility, all while reaping punitive taxation windfalls.
There is zero reason not to simply do this for electric vehicles, and leave everyone else alone.
768 MB Ryzen VPS
1x AMD Ryzen 3900X Core
12 GB NVMe SSD
768 MB DDR4 RAM
2000GB Monthly Bandwidth
1Gbps Public Network Port
Full Root Admin Access
1 Dedicated IPv4 Address
KVM / SolusVM
Available in Multiple Locations
$15.00/YEAR!
[ORDER HERE]https://my.racknerd.com/cart.php?a=add&pid=499
1 GB Ryzen VPS
1x AMD Ryzen 3900X Core
15 GB NVMe SSD
1 GB DDR4 RAM
3000GB Monthly Bandwidth
1Gbps Public Network Port
Full Root Admin Access
1 Dedicated IPv4 Address
KVM / SolusVM
Available in Multiple Locations
$21.49/YEAR!
[ORDER HERE]