Daily Shaarli

All links of one day in a single page.

February 4, 2023

How to Get Out of Jury Duty: 12 Steps (with Pictures) - wikiHow

While in many countries it is a citizen's duty to serve occasionally on a jury, there are some ways to avoid such duty if it would prove a true hardship. Failure to respond to a summons for jury duty is not a good idea: that could result in up to two years' incarceration or a substantial fine. However, if you have a legitimate reason for avoiding jury duty, you should go through the legal process of getting yourself excused.

After 16 years of freeware, Dwarf Fortress creators get their $7M payday | Ars Technica

The quirky work of two brothers' lives has found a wider audience on Steam and Itchi.io, and now they have some breathing room.

The month before Dwarf Fortress was released on Steam (and Itch.io), the brothers Zach and Tarn Adams made $15,635 in revenue, mostly from donations for their 16-year freeware project. The month after the game's commercial debut, they made $7,230,123, or 462 times that amount.

"The fairytale ending is reality, but you didn't kiss the toad," Zach Adams wrote on Bay 12 Games' forums. "You gave him money." He went on to write the kind of grateful response to fans you don't often see from game developers:

The appreciation you give us is part of our being now. It carries us in the cars we drive. It sustains us as the food that we eat. There is now no longer any existence except the one that you have provided. When we pass from this world, you will be the reason we are remembered.

Tarn Adams noted that "a little less than half will go to taxes," and that other people and expenses must be paid. But enough of it will reach the brothers themselves that "we've solved the main issues of health/retirement that are troubling for independent people." It also means that Putnam, a longtime modder and scripter and community member, can continue their work on the Dwarf Fortress code base, having been hired in December.

Fire with Fire by Charles Gannon - Baen Ebooks

2105, September: Intelligence Analyst Caine Riordan uncovers a conspiracy on Earth's Moon—a history-making clandestine project—and ends up involuntarily cryocelled for his troubles. Twelve years later, Riordan awakens to a changed world. Humanity has achieved faster-than-light travel and is pioneering nearby star systems. And now, Riordan is compelled to become an inadvertent agent of conspiracy himself. Riordan's mission: travel to a newly settled world and investigate whether a primitive local species was once sentient—enough so to have built a lost civilization.

Until further notice, think twice before using Google to download software | Ars Technica

Searching Google for downloads of popular software has always come with risks, but over the past few months, it has been downright dangerous, according to researchers and a pseudorandom collection of queries.

“Threat researchers are used to seeing a moderate flow of malvertising via Google Ads,” volunteers at Spamhaus wrote on Thursday. “However, over the past few days, researchers have witnessed a massive spike affecting numerous famous brands, with multiple malware being utilized. This is not ‘the norm.’”

Freak infection with an eradicated form of polio shows virus’ craftiness | Ars Technica

Without wastewater sampling, the eradicated virus could have easily spread.

An eradicated form of wild polio surfaced in routine wastewater monitoring in the Netherlands last year, offering a cautionary tale on the importance of monitoring for the tenacious virus, researchers report this week in the journal Eurosurveilance.

The sewage sample came up positive for infectious poliovirus in mid-November and genome sequencing revealed a strain of wild poliovirus type 3, which was declared globally eradicated in 2019. Its potential revival would be a devastating setback in the decades-long effort to stamp out highly infectious and potentially paralytic germ for good. //

For brief background, there are three types of wild polioviruses: type 2 and type 3 have been eradicated, with the former being knocked out in 2015. Wild poliovirus type 1 continues to circulate in Afghanistan and Pakistan. There are also occasional vaccine-derived polioviruses that circulate in communities with low vaccination rates, which recently occurred in New York.

The positive wastewater sample last year was the first and only indication of a polio infection with the bygone strain in the Netherlands. It occurred in an employee of a vaccine production facility run by Bilthoven Biologicals, which makes inactivated polio vaccines. The Netherlands had set up routine wastewater surveillance around the production site to monitor for such a viral escape. //

reviewer1 Smack-Fu Master, in training
3y
40
As a brief supplementary primer on poliovirus vaccines, there are two major versions, Salk's inactivated polio vaccine and Sabin's oral polio vaccine. Both of them are incredibly good at protecting against the paralytic disease of poliomyelitis. They are both less than 100% effective at preventing infection and replication of the virus in a vaccinated person's intestinal tract. So they protect the vaccinated person but should not be counted on to build towards herd immunity because they don't prevent someone from getting infected, making a few million new copies of the virus and putting those back into the water supply (or whatever else they touch without washing their hands properly). For more, see: https://www.who.int/teams/health-pr...specifications/vaccines-quality/poliomyelitis

The oral polio vaccine is better at producing a mucosal immune response in the intestines, so it's better at preventing someone from getting meaningfully infected at all. However, the oral polio vaccine uses live attenuated virus. The tricky thing about live virus is that it mutates and, given enough time, those mutations can undo the attenuation mutations and allow it to become more virulent.

So each vaccine has strengths and weaknesses. At this point, I think the most important thing to know is that being vaccinated for poliovirus protects against getting sick, not against getting infected, and infected people can and do shed virus that can infect others. //

FreeRangeOrganicSoyLatteCappuccino Ars Praetorian
2y
2,629
Uncivil Servant said:
Just to be clear, the inactivated vaccine still protects against infection as well as paralytic polio, but the oral attenuated vaccine provides better protection against the initial infection compared to the inactivated vaccine.

There's an important distinction between "the inactivated vaccine is less effective in preventing (non-paralytic) infection compared to the oral attentuated vaccine" and "the inactivated vaccine does not prevent (non-paralytic) infections".

The oral vaccine also has some advantages in terms of storage and transporation in rural areas of developing nations. It's also a lot easier to administer, especially to young children. But yes, it comes with risks. Hopefully soon polio will go the way of smallpox and rinderpest.
Click to expand...The inactivated vaccine (iPV) provides minimal protection against intestinal mucosal infection. So a person vaccinated with iPV is immune from paralytic complications of polio, can still be infected with polio and continuously poop out viral particles. iPV protects the person, not the population.

The oral vaccine (OPV) provides protection against BOTH intestinal mucosal infection and the paralytic complications of polio. However, there is a chance that the OPV mutates and reverts back to an active virus.

Presumably, this vaccine factory worker was working with a lab sample of type 3 polio and got sloppy with technique. That some worker was presumably vaccinated using the iPV which protected them from paralytic polio, but did NOT protect them from getting polio into their gut and replicating/shedding virus.

CKing123 Wise, Aged Ars Veteran
7y
192
mgforbes said:
Does getting both the injected and oral version of the vaccine confer better immunity, or is it a case of when you've had one, the other one doesn't work?
So OPV (Oral Polio Vaccine) provides antibodies in the guts which means you can blunt transmission and provides protection against infection for a few months. IPV (Inactivated Polio Vaccine) only creates antibodies in blood so you can still get infected and shed the virus (you can for OPV after a while too, but you will blunt transmission). However, the antibodies in blood prevent polio from getting to nerves and causing paralysis. However, if you ever have had OPV, you can be given IPV later and it will increase antibodies in the guts once again without requiring you to take OPV again.

Enter the hunter satellites preparing for space war | Ars Technica

Communication Commission (FCC), True Anomaly is now gearing up for its first orbital mission. In October, True Anomaly hopes to launch two Jackal “orbital pursuit” spacecraft aboard a SpaceX rocket to low earth orbit. The Jackals will not house guns, warheads, or laser blasters, but they will be capable of rendezvous proximity operations (RPO)—the ability to maneuver close to other satellites and train a battery of sensors upon them. This could reveal their rivals’ surveillance and weapons systems or help intercept communications.

Extremely drug-resistant germ found in eye drops infects 55 in 12 states; 1 dead [Updated] | Ars Technica

An extensively drug-resistant bacterial strain is spreading in the US for the first time and causing an alarming outbreak linked to artificial tears eye drops, according to an alert released Wednesday evening from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. So far, the germ has caused various infections in 55 people in 12 states, killing one and leaving others hospitalized and with permanent vision loss.

Pine Tar Game: Story behind George Brett's controversial home run - Sports Illustrated

On July 24, 1983, the Kansas City Royals' George Brett hit a ninth-inning home run against the New York Yankees that would become the most controversial homer in baseball history. Here is an oral history of the Pine Tar Game.

"The bat handle, for not more than 18 inches from the end, may be covered or treated with any material (including pine tar) to improve the grip. Any such material, including pine tar, which extends past the 18-inch limitation, in the umpire's judgment, shall cause the bat to be removed from the game. No such material shall improve the reaction or distance factor of the bat." — Rule 1.10 (b), Official Rules of Baseball, 1983