If this guy really believes what he said, he'd dangerous //

I might even go so far as to say this face mask (brandishes face mask) is more guaranteed to protect me against COVID than when I take a COVID vaccine.

Innovations outside traditional vaccines.

What Congress is doing, as it always does, is attempting to throw money at the problems that we and state and local legislatures have created. We’ve locked down our economy, isolated Americans from their loved ones and friends, forced stringent protocols on businesses, allowed mob rule to take over our cities, and now believe that more money, not a complete reversal of these failed policies, is the path forward. It is patently absurd.

The best thing we, the elected leadership of America, can do is move towards a full reopening. We must release the restrictions of businesses and the American people to let them choose how to best return to normalcy.

Mandatory masking policies stifle the American spirit and are segueing us right into mandated COVID-19 vaccines. Here's how.

Moore’s repeated accusations — along with those of Nancy Pelosi and the Democrat Party, and the liberal media — that Trump ignored COVID warnings early-on ring hollow. As Breitbart noted, Democrats were too busy “pushing impeachment” while COVID began to spread.

January 11: Chinese state media report the first known death from an illness originating in the Wuhan market.
January 15: Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) holds a vote to send articles of impeachment to the Senate. Pelosi and House Democrats celebrate the “solemn” occasion with a signing ceremony, using commemorative pens. That same day, the first person with coronavirus in the United States arrives from China, where he had been in Wuhan.
January 21: The first American case of coronavirus is confirmed at a clinic in Snohomish County, Washington.
January 23: The House impeachment managers make their opening arguments for removing President Trump.
January 23: China closes off the city of Wuhan completely to slow the spread of coronavirus to the rest of China.
January 27: The White House convenes a special task force to deal with the emerging threat of coronavirus.
January 29: The president chairs a meeting of the White House coronavirus task force for the first time.
January 30: Senators begin asking two days of questions of both sides in the president’s impeachment trial.
January 30: The World Health Organization declares a global health emergency as coronavirus continues to spread.
January 31: The Senate holds a vote on whether to allow further witnesses and documents in the impeachment trial.
January 31: President Trump declares a national health emergency and imposes a ban on travel to and from China. Former Vice President Joe Biden calls Trump’s decision “hysterical xenophobia … and fear-mongering.” //

Facts are stubborn things, as President John Adams famously said. Actually, Adams’s full quote is even more applicable to the Left:

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”

This release from the CDC calls into question the efficacy of mask policy if their own statements are true. //

CDC: Cloth masks that are used to slow the spread of COVID-19 offer little protection against wildfire smoke. They do not catch small particles found in wildfire smoke that can harm your health. Limit your time outside when it’s smoky. Learn how you can protect yourself from wildfire smoke: https://bit.ly/3kSMjl9.

You would think Joe Biden and Kamala Harris would be circumspect about rooting against a vaccine that the nation and the world desperately need. //

By adding partisan politics to the potent mix of paranoia and myths that have made the anti-vaxxer movement impervious to scientists’ arguments, Democrats may have already done real damage to a post-vaccine pandemic recovery. A Gallup poll conducted in August indicates 35 percent of Americans won’t take a COVID vaccine if it were available. //

what Biden and Harris fail to understand is that resistance to vaccines won’t disappear if they are in charge. The impact of the anti-vaxxer movement will be strengthened by attacks from the Democrats. Indeed, it’s likely that the already troubling resistance to such measures on the right will grow if it is Biden rather than Trump who will be asking conservatives to get vaccinated.

Democrats love to claim to be “the party of science!” but it is they who are acting like science deniers. By undermining faith in a vaccine for COVID-19, they lay further groundwork for a movement that may have already grown strong enough to destroy any hope that a vaccine will end the COVID nightmare.

"This report isn't science..."

A closer look at the Bradykinin hypothesis

  The bad news about the unprecedented dangers of COVID-19 just keeps piling up. We’ve known for months that we’re dealing with the first virus known to cause motorcycle fatalities. And health officials have warned that COVID-19 is causing fatal crashes even when there are no underlying conditions!

In short, all the available research seems to indicate that positive PCR test results are utterly meaningless.

It turns out that the guy who won a Nobel Prize for inventing the process was right. //

Clearly someone needs to investigate why the CDC recommended that COVID testing labs run samples through 40 amplification cycles.

Why PCR testing is even still being used to generate data that keeps the country in a state of panic when it’s clearly worthless is another thing that obviously needs to be looked into seriously.

Because any test for COVID-19 will produce a certain percentage of positive diagnoses for patients who don’t, in fact, have the virus, mass testing means that alarming numbers of new COVID-19 cases will keep getting reported every day no matter how few are actually occurring.

The FDA says that one test in use has a false positive rate of 3%. That means that testing a million people a day with it would still result in 30,000 positive diagnoses being reported each day even if the real number of new infections dropped all the way down to zero! //

Nick Pineault
@nickpineault1
Recent graphic from @wodarg -- the false-positive rate of PCR tests is equal to the COVID-positive rate % in Germany... Infections they're finding are likely false-positives. //

Interestingly, the CDC and other health authorities were very much concerned about the percentage of false-positive results PCR-testing is bound to produce during every signle one of the previous four viral pandemics this century. But for some reason, they completely forgot about it this time around. //

“PCR” stands for polymerase chain reaction, the biochemical process developed by a researcher named Kary Mullis in 1983 that the test uses.

Though it was important enough to earn Mullis a Nobel Prize, most are unaware that PCR wasn‘t designed to test for viruses at all.

Mullis invented it to synthesize genetic material for research purposes and, in fact, was strongly opposed to the way it wound up being used to test for the HIV virus.

Mullis’s process takes segments of DNA through a “cycle” that doubles the amount. That might not seem like a big deal, but it starts to add up pretty quickly. //

Quantitative PCR is an oxymoron.

PCR can’t detect quantity. At best, it can detect the presence of a virus, not the amount. And without knowing the amount, there’s no way to tell if the person being tested is infected. //

If you run a sample with minute traces of viral remains through enough cycles, you’ll wind up with enough to be detected.

And it turns out that laboratories have been running the samples their testing through so many cycles that ones without nearly enough viral remains to indicate the presence of a live virus are, nonetheless, being amplified enough to produce a positive test result.

Moreover, the CDC has been telling them to do it…

“The man who reads nothing at all is better educated than the man who reads nothing but newspapers.”
― Thomas Jefferson

You know those standard PCR tests for the COVID-19 virus that everybody in America has been rushing out to get? Well, according to the Times, they’re “diagnosing huge numbers of people who may be carrying relatively insignificant amounts of the virus” and “are not likely to be contagious.”

In fact, when they looked at three sets of testing data from Massachusetts, New York, and Nevada, the Times says that, because of faulty procedures used at every single testing site in the country, “up to 90 percent of people testing positive carried barely any virus” at all.

Prevention and Treatment

The owner says it felt like "a slap in the face"

He's not backing down.

Ethical Skeptic ☀
@EthicalSkeptic
·
Aug 25
It is a calculation which dilutes the cases reported, by a factor of testing increases relative to the strike date of Apr 16.

April 12 - 25th is an inflection point (I select 16th)

1. Not just testing sick anymore
2. Test kits proliferate
3. Not yet fully into the decline.

It is here we strike a reference point between tests run, and positives found. Math is as you understand, yes.

I mean allegorical lemmings and Lemming Cycle not a zoology term. In this, the lemmings who have jumped over the cliff, tell the lemmings still standing upon the cliff, how wonderful the breeze is...

The problem of linear induction inside the context of mob rule...

Sweden's discovery may actually be a global problem.

The CDC has kicked speculation into high gear.

Experts around the world cannot agree on whether the right approach is to open up schools, scale back lockdowns, and wear masks.